|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Regional Responses to |
||||
|
Statement:
Humanitarian Intervention in Liberia FfP Reports: The Capacity to Protect: The Role of Civil Society July 2005 Download page Neighbors on Alert Regional Views on Humanitarian Intervention A Summary Report of The Regional Responses to Internal War Program October 2003 (PDF, 307k) Issue #5: Perspectives from Europe on Military Intervention June 2003 (PDF, 1.5M) Issue #4: Perspectives from Asia on Military Intervention September 2002 (PDF, 900k) Issue #3: Perspectives from the Americas on Military Intervention June 2002 (PDF, 480k) Issue #2: Criteria for Military Intervention in Internal Wars: The Debate December 2001 (PDF, 220k) Issue #1: African Perspectives on Military Intervention: Conference Summary December 2001 (PDF, 560k) Reality Check: Diverse Voices on Internal Conflict Issue #8: Gen. Daniel Opande (PDF, 63k) Issue #7: Dr. Chung Oknim (PDF, 66k) Issue #6: Dr. Nono Anwar Makarim (PDF, 60k) Issue #5: Dr. Eduardo Stein (PDF, 71k) Issue #4: Claudette Werleigh (PDF, 67k) Issue #3: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf (PDF, 165k) Issue #2: Ambassador Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah (PDF, 500k) Issue #1: Gen. Ahmedou Toumani Touré (PDF, 80k) |
Military interventions in internal conflicts raise legal, moral, and practical questions that the international community is still struggling to address. Some interventions have conformed to, and reinforced, existing international law and procedures while others have been more ad hoc in nature. Some interventions have been successful while others have been deeply flawed. Still others that, in hindsight, might have been successful in saving thousands of lives never materialized at all. During its first two years, the RRIW program enriched the global debate on humanitarian responses by building regional consensus on the criteria for military intervention during four conferences that explored regional values on preventing and responding to humanitarian crises. These meetings assembled over 100 participants representing diverse academic, governmental, civil society, and military expertise from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Participants shared their findings with the American public and media through a series of open forums, and they engaged senior American policy officials in the search for a common vision for confronting humanitarian emergencies. The results yielded a recognition that a new normative standard to protect civilians from mass killing and gross violations of human rights has emerged. Moreover, participants from each of the four regions stressed that regional or subregional approaches to security issues need to be pursued and strengthened. In its next phase, the program will examine specific regional capacities to fulfill the criteria regional participants identified. The program will combine original field research, outreach to local civil society organizations in each region, and engagement with regional organization leaders and US policymakers. Creating a clear assessment of organizational capacity is crucial to developing a greater role for these organizations in resolving internal disputes and developing policies for a new international architecture to respond to humanitarian emergencies. The Fund for Peace will work with global partners towards this goal through a series of activities:
The program will disseminate its findings widely through published reports, web-site publications, its Reality Check interview series, and a final, book-length monograph. The program is funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York and is being carried out in partnership with the The Peace Fund of the Netherlands.
|
|||